Capabilities

What we secure.

We focus on the specific points where AI systems fail: prompts, retrieval pipelines, model behavior, and agent tool execution.

Prompt

Threat Modeling for LLM Apps

AI applications introduce attack surfaces that traditional threat models miss. We map how prompts, context windows, and retrieved data flow through your system, identifying where inputs can be manipulated, where context can be poisoned, and where outputs might leak sensitive information.

What We Examine

  • Prompt construction and template injection points
  • Context window composition and overflow behavior
  • Data flow between retrieval, model, and downstream systems
  • Trust boundaries between user input and system instructions

What You Get

  • A threat model specific to your AI architecture
  • Prioritized list of attack surfaces with severity ratings
  • Recommended mitigations for each identified risk
  • Documentation of trust boundaries and data flows
Hop 1
Input
Malicious user input
Hop 2
Prompt
Prompt injection
Hop 3
Retrieval
Poisoned context
Hop 4
Model
Unsafe generation
Hop 5
Tool Call
Over-permissioned actions
Hop 6
Action
Unintended side effects
Model

AI Red Teaming

We test AI systems the way an attacker would. This means adversarial prompts, jailbreak attempts, prompt injection chains, and edge cases that expose unintended behaviors. The goal is to find failures before users do.

What We Examine

  • Direct and indirect prompt injection resistance
  • Jailbreak and guardrail bypass techniques
  • Output manipulation and hallucination exploitation
  • Multi-turn attack chains and context poisoning

What You Get

  • A structured red team report with reproducible test cases
  • Classification of failures by type and severity
  • Evidence of successful and unsuccessful attack attempts
  • Remediation guidance for each finding
Hop 1
Input
Malicious user input
Hop 2
Prompt
Prompt injection
Hop 3
Retrieval
Poisoned context
Hop 4
Model
Unsafe generation
Hop 5
Tool Call
Over-permissioned actions
Hop 6
Action
Unintended side effects
Retrieval

RAG & Retrieval Security

Retrieval-Augmented Generation systems are only as trustworthy as their data sources. We examine how documents are ingested, embedded, retrieved, and injected into prompts — looking for poisoned content, manipulated rankings, and information that should never reach the model.

What We Examine

  • Document ingestion pipelines and content validation
  • Embedding integrity and retrieval manipulation
  • Chunk selection logic and relevance poisoning
  • Data leakage through retrieved context

What You Get

  • Assessment of your retrieval pipeline security posture
  • Identified poisoning vectors and data leakage paths
  • Recommendations for content validation and filtering
  • Secure retrieval architecture guidance
Hop 1
Input
Malicious user input
Hop 2
Prompt
Prompt injection
Hop 3
Retrieval
Poisoned context
Hop 4
Model
Unsafe generation
Hop 5
Tool Call
Over-permissioned actions
Hop 6
Action
Unintended side effects
Tool Call

Agent & Tool-Use Guardrails

AI agents that call tools, execute code, or take actions in the real world need constraints. We analyze permission models, tool call validation, and action boundaries to ensure agents cannot be manipulated into performing unintended operations.

What We Examine

  • Tool call permission models and scope boundaries
  • Input validation on tool parameters
  • Action confirmation and human-in-the-loop controls
  • Escalation paths and privilege boundaries

What You Get

  • A permission audit of your agent's tool access
  • Identified over-permission and escalation risks
  • Guardrail design recommendations
  • Human-in-the-loop integration guidance
Hop 1
Input
Malicious user input
Hop 2
Prompt
Prompt injection
Hop 3
Retrieval
Poisoned context
Hop 4
Model
Unsafe generation
Hop 5
Tool Call
Over-permissioned actions
Hop 6
Action
Unintended side effects

Ready to secure your AI application?